Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lohri v. 4:12-cv-568-RAS-DDB et al
as 4:2014cv00204
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, 4:12-cv-568-RAS-DDB, U.S. Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Lohri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldman, et al v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2012cv11424
Plaintiff:
Carrie Goldman and Joshua Goldman
Defendant:
Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Ronald Davis and Araceli Davis
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America NA , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. BAC Home Loan Servicing LP
as 4:2012cv00692
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. BAC Home Loan Servicing LP
as 3:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heiman v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2011cv04285
Plaintiff:
Scott Heiman
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lewis v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Shaun Lewis
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gilbert et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00559
Plaintiff:
Dan Gilbert and Eunelle Gilbert
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SCHOFFSTALL v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP
as 2:2011cv00694
Plaintiff:
NANCY J. SCHOFFSTALL
Defendant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waldholz v. Wilshire Credit
as 1:2011cv10434
Plaintiff:
Alana Waldholz
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, and U.S.Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
