Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Baram v. Doe
as 24-599
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BARAM, an individual
Defendant:
JANE DOE, an individual, DICELLO LEVITT, fka DiCello Levitt Gutzler a law firm, THE HABA LAW FIRM P.A., a law firm and others
Doe v. Baram
as 23-1192
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Jonathan Baram
Defendant / Appellant:
Warren & Baram Management LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Apax Partners LLP et al v. APX Capital Group et al
as 1:2022cv04160
Defendant:
APX Capital Group, Apax Capital Group, Yona Wiesenthal and others
Plaintiff:
Apax Partners LLP and Apax Partners US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Doe v. Baram et al
as 1:2020cv09522
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Warren & Baram Management LLC and Jonathan Baram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frye v. Lagerstrom
as 19-4360
Defendant:
David Nevens, CBS INC./SHOWTIME, Jonathan Baram and others
Not Yet Classified:
Benjamin F. Lagerstrom, AKA Benjamin Irish and Joseph Frye
Frye v. Lagerstrom
as 18-2148
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Frye
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Benjamin F. Lagerstrom, AKA Benjamin Irish
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrea Simon, Matthew Blank, CBS INC./SHOWTIME and others
Defendant:
Dianacollv, Inc., MG. Public Relations, Inc., Showtime Networks, Inc and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
