Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
US v. Hunter Dent
as 21-2296
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the State of North Carolina, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin, ex rel
Appellant: HUNTER GARRETT DENT and HAILEY SHANNON DENT
Plaintiff: DR. MICHAEL MAYES, Relator, SCARLETT LUTZ, Relator, KAYLA WEBSTER, Relator and others
Defendant: LATONYA MALLORY, HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY INC., SINGULEX INC. and others
US v. Hunter Dent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2147
Plaintiff: DR. MICHAEL MAYES, Relator, KAYLA WEBSTER, Relator, CHRIS RIEDEL and others
Defendant: FLOYD CALHOUN DENT, III, BERKELEY HEARTLAB, INC., SINGULEX INC. and others
Interested Party: TRINI "D" ISLAND, LLC, CHRISTINA M. DENT, COBALT HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED and others
Not Yet Classified: HUNTER GARRETT DENT, L.D., minor child and HAILEY SHANNON DENT
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the State of North Carolina, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin, ex rel
Garret, et al v. Berkeley Heartlab Inc
as 4:2017mc00361
Plaintiff: Kristie A. Garrett and Pinnacle Consulting Inc
Defendant: Berkeley Heartlab Inc
Miscellaneou: United States of America
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States et al v. Berkeley Heartlab Inc
as 2:2017mc00145
Plaintiff: United States and Michael Mayes
Defendant: Berkeley Heartlab Inc
United States et al v. Berkeley Heartlab, Inc.
as 4:2017mc00104
Plaintiff: United States and Michael Mayes
Defendant: Berkeley Heartlab, Inc.
Movant: Kristie A. Garrett and Pinnacle Consulting, Inc.
United States et al v. Berkeley Heartlab Inc
as 2:2017mc00055
Plaintiff: United States and Michael Mayes
Defendant: Berkeley Heartlab Inc
Miscellaneou: White Arnold & Dowd PC
Christina Dent v. United States of America
as 16-1601
Party-in-Interest - Appellant: CHRISTINA M. DENT, LAKELIN PINES, LLC and TRINI "D" ISLAND, LLC
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, CALIFORNIA, ILLINOIS EX REL. SCARLETT LUTZ, KAYLA WEBSTER, DR. MICHAEL MAYES AND CHRIS RIEDEL
Party Below: BLUE EAGLE FARMING, LLC, EAGLE RAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, FORSE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant: BLUEWAVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, INC., FLOYD CALHOUN DENT, III, ROBERT BRADFORD JOHNSON and others
Intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blue Eagle Farming, LLC v. United States of America
as 16-1600
Party-in-Interest - Appellant: BLUE EAGLE FARMING, LLC, EAGLE RAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, FORSE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, CALIFORNIA, ILLINOIS EX REL. SCARLETT LUTZ, KAYLA WEBSTER, DR. MICHAEL MAYES AND CHRIS RIEDEL
Party Below: CHRISTINA M. DENT, LAKELIN PINES, LLC and TRINI "D" ISLAND, LLC
Defendant: BLUEWAVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, INC., FLOYD CALHOUN DENT, III, ROBERT BRADFORD JOHNSON and others
Intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bluewave Healthcare v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1597
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, CALIFORNIA, ILLINOIS EX REL. SCARLETT LUTZ, KAYLA WEBSTER, DR. MICHAEL MAYES AND CHRIS RIEDEL
Party Below: BLUE EAGLE FARMING, LLC, EAGLE RAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, FORSE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant: BLUEWAVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, INC., FLOYD CALHOUN DENT, III and ROBERT BRADFORD JOHNSON
Defendant: HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY INC., SINGULEX INC., LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS and others
Intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Berkeley HeartLab, Inc. v. Berkeley Heart Europe AS
as 1:2014cv14059
Petitioner: Berkeley HeartLab, Inc.
Respondent: Berkeley Heart Europe AS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?