Cases 1 - 10 of 44
SZEMPLE v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2019cv12746
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, REGISTER SCO SAUNDERS, BEVERLY HASTINGS and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2015cv05703
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RUSSO
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, PLOUSIS, E.J.S.P PAROLE COUNSELORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2015cv03371
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH MATHEWS PITTMAN
Defendant:
SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOFFORD et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv05723
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WOFFORD and VINCENT RAY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, BEVERLY HASTINGS and JANE & JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2014cv03165
Plaintiff:
HAKIM KELLY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, MELISSA MATTHEWS, COLM FOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. HASTINGS
as 2:2014cv02602
Petitioner:
TYRONE SMITH
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MINCEY v. HASTINGS et al
as 1:2014cv01527
Petitioner:
CHARLES MINCEY
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMBO v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2014cv00874
Petitioner:
ROY L. RAMBO, JR.
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and KEVIN M. O'DOWD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HINES v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
ERIC HINES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, CINDY FORD, KEVIN BOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HASTINGS et al
as 2:2013cv06974
Plaintiff:
RANDY JOHNSON
Defendant:
BEVERLY HASTINGS and GRACE AMISTOSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
