Cases 1 - 10 of 13
KAETZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VALENTA v. BI INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2020cv00912
Defendant:
BI INCORPORATED, VERN (last name unknown), TARA (Supervisor-last name unknown) and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JOHN VALENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Grant v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020cv00296
Defendant:
BI Incorporated, Erik Hooks and Reliant Mangement Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gullett-El v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Petitioner:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El
Respondent:
Kim Lee Watson, Jim Haskett, Patrick Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hephzibah-El v. Anderson et al
as 3:2017cv00440
Petitioner:
Syteria Hephzibah-El
Respondent:
Irish Anderson, Cedric L Donar, Kim Lee Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GEO Group, Inc, The et al v. Swando et al
as 1:2016cv02315
Plaintiff:
GEO Group, Inc, The and BI Incorporated
Defendant:
Matthew J Swando and Numerex Corp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831
ALVAREZ et al v. BI INCORPORATED
as 2:2016cv02705
Plaintiff:
KAREL ALVAREZ and JUAN TELLADO
Defendant:
BI INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Simpson v. Allison et al
as 1:2013cv02073
Plaintiff:
Norman Simpson
Defendant:
Mark Allison, Mark (I) Allison, Shawn Deeingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRESSLEY v. BI INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2012cv05253
Plaintiff:
NEIL PRESSLEY
Defendant:
BI INCORPORATED , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC PARTNERSHIPS OR CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Koontz v. BI Incorporated GPS Tracking et al
as 3:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kevin Koontz
Defendant:
BI Incorporated GPS Tracking, Jenifer Tierney and Rocky Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
