Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 433
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lavi v. BNP Paribas Brach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06922
Plaintiff: Pierre Lavi
Defendant: BNP Paribas Brach and MBassy of Marroc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Mary Ofisi, et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A., et al
as 22-7083
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mary Ofisi, Aaron Makau Ndivo, Adam Titus Wamai and others
Defendant / Appellee: BNP Paribas, S.A. and Al Shamal Islamic Bank
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02376
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Verdi Law Group, P.C. v. Sparx Asset Management Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv09460
Plaintiff: Verdi Law Group, P.C.
Defendant: Sparx Asset Management Co., Ltd., BVL Capital 2021 Ltd, BNP Paribas, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
In re: Farfetch Limited Securi
as 21-2752
Plaintiff: Jeff Omdahl and Jeff Omdahl, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: IAM National Pension Fund and Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Defendant / Appellee: Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?