Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Martin v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-4037
Petitioner / Appellant:
BOBBY MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, FCI Warden
Bobby Martin v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2023cv09812
Petitioner:
Bobby Martin
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
ABARA JOHNSON, ANN HAYES, ANNIE SCOTT and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MARTIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv07433
Plaintiff:
BOBBI MARTIN and THE ESTATE OF ROBERTA FRANCES CARR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARD v. USA
as 3:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
BOBBY MARTIN WARD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bobby MartinIn re: Bobby Martin
as 23-11530
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBY MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bobby MartinIn re: Bobby Martin
as 23-11237
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBY MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bobby Arthur Martin v. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv09151
Petitioner:
Bobby Martin
Respondent:
FCI Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bobby Martin v. Warden Birkholz
as 2:2022cv07588
Petitioner:
Bobby Martin
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin v. Rygh et al
as 1:2022cv01321
Plaintiff:
Bobby Martin
Defendant:
James Rygh, . Seipp, Alexander Eddlemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
