Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Bobby Sheppard v. Norm Robinson
as 13-3900
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY T. SHEPPARD
Respondent - Appellee:
NORM ROBINSON, Warden
Bobby Sheppard v. Norm Robinson
as 13-3165
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY T. SHEPPARD
Respondent - Appellee:
NORM ROBINSON
Sheppard v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00198
Petitioner:
Bobby T. Sheppard
Defendant:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Sheppard v. Margaret Bagley
as 09-3472
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY T. SHEPPARD
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET A. BAGLEY, Warden
-MRM Sheppard v. Bagley
as 1:2000cv00493
Petitioner:
Bobby T Sheppard
Respondent:
Margaret A Bagley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.