Cases 1 - 10 of 1,966
BONNER v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05189
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARLA BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonner v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50145
Petitioner:
Lee Bonner
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eads v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Municipality of Robersonville et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
S. Boyd
Defendant:
Municipality of Robersonville, Leon Bonner, Cynthia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bonner v. Collier
as 24-50229
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director of Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bonner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
