Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HOFFMAN v. UNKNOWN BOP, DOJ, DOD EMPLOYEES
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PATRICK HOFFMAN, II
Defendant:
UNKNOWN BOP, DOJ, DOD EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KADAMOVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), COLLETTE PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KOCH v. SCHMALENSEE et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KOCH
Defendant:
SCHMALENSEE, MAQUETTE, DELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HILL v. COUNTER TERRORISM UNIT et al
as 2:2021cv00110
Defendant:
COUNTER TERRORISM UNIT, BRADLEY, BOP DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00017
Respondent:
USP TERRE HAUTE, BOP and T. WATSON
Petitioner:
BRIAN GALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAPPELL v. BOP
as 2:2020cv00224
Defendant:
BOP EMPLOYEES, et al.
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPPELL v. FEDERAL BOP et al
as 2:2020cv00024
Petitioner:
BRYAN C. CHAPPELL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BOP and LAMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cantu v. US Department of Justice et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Designation Sentencing Computation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, WARDEN JOHN CARAWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BOLDEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
