Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United Steel, Paper, Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 13-1717
Amicus Curiae:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC., WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
BILLITER v. RETIREMENT INCOME PROGRAM of BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS INC., MUNCIE PLANT et al
as 1:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BILLITER
Defendant:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC. and RETIREMENT INCOME PROGRAM of BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS INC., MUNCIE PLANT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS INC. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION et al
as 1:2009cv00236
Plaintiff:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS INC.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNTIED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS WORKERS OF AMERICA, ITS LOCAL NO. 287, JIM BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA et al v. BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC., BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC. and BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
