Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Russell Showers v. Courtney Rodgers, et al
as 23-1241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL SHOWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. COURTNEY RODGERS, M.D., Medical Director/Supervising Physician at SCI-Mahanoy, JOHN STEINHART, Correctional Health Care Administrator, KIM MINARCHICK, CCS/Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) and others
Covert v. Houser et al
as 1:2020cv02022
Defendant:
Ms. B. Mason, Ms. White, RN Brenda Houser and others
Plaintiff:
John Covert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Showers v. Rodgers, M.D. et al
as 3:2020cv01868
Defendant:
John Steinhart, Correct Care Solutions (CCS), Patricia Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Showers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv03058
Defendant:
JOHN STEINHART, DR. THOMAS LEHMAN, DR. LITTLES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01835
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, RNS Kimberly Minarchick, Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Quinzell Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimball v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01411
Plaintiff:
Daniel Craig Kimball
Defendant:
John Steinhart, Jay Cowan, RN Brenda Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKENS v. HOUSER
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
Brenda Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKENS v. HOUSER
as 2:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
BRENDA HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKENS v. HOUSER
as 1:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
JOHN AIKENS
Defendant:
BRENDA HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheri Tretter v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 13-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERI TRETTER, Individually and as Adminstratix of the Estate of William Bender, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI FRACKVILLE, PHS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
