Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 56
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 2:2011cv09123
Amicu: American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Intervenor: S. Baek, S. Dado, G. Hinkle and others
Defendant: Bush, Matthew Cates, B. Flores and others
Unknown: David A. Carrillo, Samantha H. Ramsey, Samantha H. Ramsey and others
916) 324-5205 (fax: James Edmund Flynn, Constance Lee Picciano, Constance Lee Picciano and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: T. Nguyen, C. Russ, Spotted Eagle Circle and others
Plaintiff: William Rouser
530) 752-5788 (fax: Carter Capps White
Derrick Benjamin v. Brian Haws, et al
as 11-56192
Plaintiff - Appellant: DERRICK BENJAMIN
Defendant - Appellee: BRIAN HAWS, CSP-LAC Warden, JAMES TILTON, Director of Cal. Dept. of Corr. & Rehabilitation (CDCR), individual, LANOK, Register Nurse (RN), individual and others
Terry Taylor v. Brian Haw
as 11-56155
Petitioner - Appellant: TERRY TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN HAWS, Warden
Ruben Hernandez v. Brian Haw
as 11-55930
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUBEN HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN HAWS, Warden
Waymond Anderson v. Brian Haw
as 11-55202
Petitioner - Appellant: WAYMOND ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN HAWS
Valencia v. Haws We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00021
Respondent: Brian Haws
Petitioner: Heriberto Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Haws et al
as 1:2011at00002
Defendant: Brian Haws and HERIBERTO VALENCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyrone Parks v. Brian Haw
as 10-56361
Petitioner - Appellant: TYRONE A. PARKS
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN HAWS, Warden
Victor Jesus Lagunas v. Brian Haws We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv01289
Respondent: Brian Haws
Petitioner: Victor Jesus Lagunas
Jesse Crespin v. Brian Hawe
as 10-56261
Petitioner - Appellant: JESSE JOE CRESPIN
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN HAWES, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?