Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Lynch v. Neven et al

as 3:2016cv00217
Defendant:
Barth, J. Cox, Lozano and others
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farvela v. Barth et al

as 2:2016cv00831
Defendant:
Jay Barth, Kyle Groover, Jerry Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Saul Farvela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seydewitz v. Stroud et al

as 2:2016cv00306
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Bruce Stroud
Petitioner:
Frederick Von Seydewitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartee v. Stroud

as 2:2016cv00158
Petitioner:
Dennis Jeff Bartee
Respondent:
Bruce Stroud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack Sr v. Stroud

as 2:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
James K Mack Sr
Respondent:
Bruce Stroud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Board of Prison Commissioners et al

as 2:2015cv01885
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Board of Prison Commissioners, Colin Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jamal Damon Hendrix v. Cox et al

as 2:2015cv00560
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Anderson, Michael Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Ervin et al

as 2:2015cv00514
Defendant:
Greg Cox, Steven Ervin, Jerry Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Williams et al

as 2:2013cv02339
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Greg Cox, Cheryl Dressler and others
Plaintiff:
Tarz Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Green v. Martin Dooley, et al
as 11-17720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HENRY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN DOOLEY, GROOVER, JIM HENSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.