Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Burns Boyd v. D. Glenn, et al
as 12-11192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. GLENN, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas, DEANA R. DAVIS, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas and KENNETH C. HOLT, B
Boyd v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2012cv00120
Petitioner:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Thaler et al
as 2:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, NFN Ponder, Micheal A Parmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns Boyd v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-10177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOHN H ADAMS, Warden, ENGLAND, Sergeant and others
Boyd v. Thaler et al
as 2:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John H Adams, NFN England and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2011cv05712
Plaintiff:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant:
DEANA R. DAVIS, JOHN H. ADAMS, MARY T. HOLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. WINTERS et al
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant:
GARY WINTERS, W. E. WALKER, M. HOLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 9:2010cv00191
Petitioner:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Parole, T.J. Scroggins and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Board of Pardons & Paroes et al
as 1:2010cv00911
Respondent:
Board of Pardons & Paroes, T. J. Scroggins and Director Rick Thaler
Petitioner:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2010cv00782
Defendant:
John Adams, Board of Pardons and Paroles, T. J. Scroggins and others
Plaintiff:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
