Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Butler et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2022cv00963
Defendant:
BWDAC, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Butler and Kathy Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aaron v. Bancroft Bag, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01082
Defendant:
Thomas Built Buses, Inc., Bancroft Bag, Inc., Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Aaron, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Settlemyer et al v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Kelsey-Hayes Company, Heavy Duty Parts, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Settlemyer and Jan Settlemyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Mustapick et al v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02305
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings, Corp., General Refractories Company and others
Plaintiff:
Irene Mustapick and Gerald Mustapick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bartlett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2019cv00711
Defendant:
ABB, INC., Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bartlett, Barry Bartlett, Marie Jean Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Michel v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Plaintiff:
Victor Anthony Michel, Victor Michel, Keith Michel and others
Defendant:
Honeywell Int. Inc., as Successor in Interest to Bendix Corp., Crane Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CHRISTY et al v. BENDIX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv71945
Plaintiff:
WILLIS J. CHRISTY, WILLIS J. CHRISTY, WILMA CHRISTY and others
Defendant:
BENDIX CORPORATION, GENUINE PARTS CO, BWD AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
