Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schilter et al v. Home Depot
as 2:2012cv00886
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA Inc , Badger Meter Inc Group Health Plan , ABC Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Nadine M Schilter and Ray Schilter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rydex, Ltd. v. Badger Meter, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Rydex Ltd
Defendant:
Badger Meter Inc , Balcrank Corporation and Lincoln Industrial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ICH Intellectual Capital Holdings, Inc. v. Badger Meter, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
ICH Intellectual Capital Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Badger Meter, Inc., Mueller Water Products, Inc., Transparent Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rydex, Ltd. v. Badger Meter, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02863
Plaintiff:
Rydex, Ltd.
Defendant:
Badger Meter, Inc., Balcrank Corporation and Lincoln Industrial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARDARO et al v. AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66763
Plaintiff:
TERRY CARDARO and JO ANN CARDARO
Defendant:
AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AGCO CORPORATION, ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARDARO et al v. ALFA LAVAL INC. et al
as 2:2007cv74046
Plaintiff:
TERRY CARDARO, TERRY CARDARO, TERRY CARDARO and others
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BADGER METER, INC. v. METERING SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2007cv03555
Plaintiff:
BADGER METER, INC.
Defendant:
METERING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
