Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bishay v. Town of Sharon et al
as 1:2023cv12094
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Defendant:
Town of Sharon, Frederic Turkington, Krishan Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bishay v. Ricciuti, et al
as 22-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHIG F. BISHAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL D. RICCIUTI, in his individual capacity, DIANA L. MALDONADO, in her individual capacity, JAMES R. LEMIRE, in his individual capacity and others
Bishay et al v. Ricciuti et al
as 1:2021cv11227
Defendant:
Arent Fox LLP, Michael D Ricciuti, Diana L Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishay v. US Court of Appeals, et al
as 19-1975
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, JEFFREY R. HOWARD, Honorable, in his individual and official capacity as Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, ELIZABETH A. KAPLAN, in her individual and official capacity as Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAHIG F. BISHAY
Bishay v. U.S. Court of Appeals
as 1:2019cv11731
Defendant:
Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, Maura Healey, U.S Courts of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bahig Bishay v. DOJ, et al
as 19-5141
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, James A. Crowell, IV, in his individual and official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bahig F. Bishay
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
