Cases 1 - 10 of 2,072
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Childers v. Senior Healthcare Advisors LLC
as 0:2024cv60553
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bailey Childers
Defendant:
Senior Healthcare Advisors LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Terri McGuire-Mollica v. Richard Griffin, et al
as 24-11081
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
RICHARD GRIFFIN, XINYU LI and SHARON BAILEY
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRINCE v. AG OF EC INC.
as 8:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
BAILEY PRINCE
Defendant:
AG OF EC INC. doing business as AND Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zoe El v. Rojas et al
as 0:2024cv60454
Plaintiff:
Chris Zoe El
Defendant:
R. Rojas, Phoebee Rebecca Francois, Mindy F Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
