Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Lamar v. Mack et al
as 1:2025cv00182
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Lamar
Defendant:
Huey Hoss Mack, Captain Graves, Sergeant Ephraim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodyard v. Baldwin County Jail et al
as 1:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Baldwin County Jail, Baldwin County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff at Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2025cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERWOOD v. BALDWIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al

as 5:2025cv00040
Plaintiff:
FAITH UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
BALDWIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, TESHA DIXON, DAWN HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chaudhary et al

as 1:2025cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Smith
Defendant:
Jashubhai Chaudhary, Mohammad Farhan, Michael Hoyt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Samson v. Baldwin County Sheriff et al
as 2:2025cv00172
Plaintiff:
James Samson
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff, Bill Massee and FBI Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Draper Woodyard v. Baldwin County Sheriff, et al
as 25-10094
Defendant:
BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE NURSE B, BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF, BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE NURSE D and others
Plaintiff:
DRAPER FRANK WOODYARD
Pugh v. Baldwin County, Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00034
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Devin Brandis Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick Jackson v. Baldwin County Sheriff, et al
as 25-10040
Defendant:
BRAD KIN, SANFORD and BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BERNARD JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.