Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bailey et al v. Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 1:2019cv24143
Plaintiff:
Dianne L. Bailey and Philip J. Bailey
Defendant:
Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dilena et al v. Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
Randy Dilena, Randy Dilena, Carolyn Dilena and others
Defendant:
Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. and Cirrus Design Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ADAMS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv01623
Plaintiff:
JANET P. ADAMS and JANET P. ADAMS
Defendant:
CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Martegani et al v. Cirrus Design Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv08809
Plaintiff:
Micaela Martegani and Micaela Martegani
Defendant:
Cirrus Design Corporation, Cirrus Design Corporation, Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Savarese v. Cirrus Design Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv04189
Plaintiff:
Esther Monique Savarese and Esther Monique Savarese
Defendant:
Cirrus Design Corporation, Cirrus Design Corporation, Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
EDESESS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv01064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT B. EDESESS, JR. and ROBERT B. EDESESS, JR.
Defendant:
CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDESESS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv00865
Plaintiff:
POOLSIRI EDESESS and POOLSIRI EDESESS
Defendant:
CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and AVIDYNE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDESESS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv00866
Plaintiff:
JEREMY EDESESS and JEREMY EDESESS
Defendant:
CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and AVIDYNE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
