Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GIFTCASH INC. v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02146
Plaintiff:
GIFTCASH INC.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Banana Republic, LLC, Old Navy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pallagrosi v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05905
Plaintiff:
Michael Pallagrosi
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Gap (Apparel), LLC, Gap International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laurie Munning v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv03804
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc. , Gap (Apparel) LLC , Gap International Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Laurie Munning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez v. Banana Republic, LLC
as 3:2014cv01132
Plaintiff:
Nick Perez
Defendant:
Banana Republic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03334
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sandi Rush v. Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Inc et al
as 8:2012cv00604
Defendant:
Charlotte Russe Inc, Cotton On USA Inc, The Retail Property Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Sandi Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Edwin Figueroa v. Levis Only Stores Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00506
Defendant:
Adidas America Inc, B and B Bachrach LL, Banana Republic LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Figueroa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chris Kohler v. Presidio International, Inc.
as 2:2010cv04680
Defendant:
QS Retail, Inc., PHV Retail Stores, Inc., The Donna Kara Company Store, LLC and others
Claimant:
Bed Bath and Beyond
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
John P Daniels
Plaintiff:
Chris Kohler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
