Cases 1 - 10 of 435
United States Of America v. Zepf et al
as 1:2024cv10811
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Michael L Zepf, Patricia A Zepf, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Gorman v. Bank of America , N.A.
as 1:2024cv10629
Plaintiff:
Nicole Gorman
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Concepcion v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2024cv40037
Plaintiff:
Richard Concepcion
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2024cv10520
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Bank of America, et al
as 24-1149
Plaintiff:
HEEWON LEE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1956
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSAKPAMWAN HENRY OMORUYI, a/k/a Clifford Bernard, a/k/a Bernard Clifford
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1957
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSARETIN GODSPOWER OMORUYI, a/k/a Bright Nelson, a/k/a Nelson Bright
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Jenzabar, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12684
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Jenzabar, Inc., LING CHAI MAGINN, ROBERT MAGINN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
