Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al
as 3:2017cv00444
Defendant:
Shelly Aldean, Jim Baetge, Marsha Berkbigler and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gregory Garmong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01963
Plaintiff:
Marion Anderson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, James Cox, Brian Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00427
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Brian Borg, Barbara Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manibusan v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00303
Defendant:
Cathy Baker, Renee Baker, Mr. Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Manibusan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reberger v. Deal et al
as 3:2017cv00251
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Renee Baker, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Satish Emrit v. Barbara Cegavske
as 17-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA CEGAVSKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEVADA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
Hosmer v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2017cv00056
Defendant:
Aranas, Artinger, Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emrit v. Cegavske et al
as 8:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Barbara Cegavske, Secretary of State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downing v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv02632
Defendant:
Adams, Akash, Barbara Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinosa v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2016cv00613
Defendant:
Tara Carpenter, Barbara Cegavske, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
