Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Maisano v. Wexford Health Services
as 4:2012cv00891
Plaintiff: Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant: Wexford Health Services, Eric H Holder, Tom Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maisano v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated
as 4:2012cv00869
Plaintiff: Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Armondo V De Guzman, Kevin S Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Lawall
as 4:2012cv00679
Plaintiff: Michael Edward Aguilar
Defendant: Barbara Lawall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beltran v. Fell et al
as 4:2011cv00314
Petitioner: Rosalio Delgado Beltran
Respondent: Howard L Fell, Arizona, State of and Barbara Lawall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Van Brocklin v. Munger et al
as 4:2010cv00656
Plaintiff: Ronald Allen Van Brocklin
Defendant: Clark Munger, John Leonardo, Pima County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Mulcahey et al
as 4:2010cv00512
Plaintiff: Dale Maisano
Defendant: Unknown Mulcahey, J Hernandez, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humberto Gama v. Barbara LaWall, et al
as 10-15689
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUMBERTO GAMA
Defendant - Appellee: BARBARA LAWALL, Pima County Attorney, FABIAN VALDEZ, Tucson Police #43047, JONATHAN MOSHER, Deputy County Attorney and others
Abdullah, et al v. Dupnik, et al
as 08-15319
Plaintiff - Appellant: SEYMOUR J. ABDULLAH
Plaintiff: JAMEELA S. ABDULLAH and AUBRIANNA M. OSBORN
Defendant - Appellee: CLARENCE W. DUPNIK, SEAN STEWART, HENDRICKS and others
Abdullah et al v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2007cv00102
Plaintiff: Seymour J. Abdullah, Jameela S. Abdullah, Aubrianna M. Osborn and others
Defendant: Clarence W Dupnik, Sean Stewart, Hendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?