Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Easton Murray, et al v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 23-15791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EASTON MURRAY
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIUS MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, PIMA, COUNTY OF, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, named as Office of the District Attorney and others
Murray v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Easton Murray
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Pima, County of, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves #339228 v. Davila et al
as 4:2020cv00372
Plaintiff:
James M Reaves, III
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Jonathan Mosher, Hayley Weigold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillespie v. Lawall et al
as 4:2020cv00384
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Gillespie
Defendant:
Mark Evans and Barbara Lawall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar #087522 v. Lawall et al
as 4:2020cv00232
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Salazar
Defendant:
Chris Magnus and Barbara Lawall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Mark Diebolt, Pima County Legal Defender's Office, Pima County Public Defender's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Eugene Martinez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Daniel South, Christopher Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esterlin Appolon v. Kevin The, et al
as 18-15457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTERLIN APPOLON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN THE, CHRIS MAGUS, MARCO BORBOA and others
Cobb #319505 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Marcell Dante Cobb
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appolon v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
Esterlin Appolon
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Ashley Schneider, Julie Sottosanti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
