Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Jones v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 4:2012cv15106
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Amy Bonito and others
Thorp #495722 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2012cv01060
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon Thorp #495722
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Amy Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2012cv14290
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Williams
Defendant:
Robert Lawrence, Barbara Sampson and Michigan Parole Board
Goree #111992 v. Combs et al
as 1:2012cv00791
Plaintiff:
Denver Goree #111992, Jr.
Defendant:
Tom Combs, Amy Bonito, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Heyens et al
as 2:2012cv12743
Petitioner:
Dejuan Edwards
Respondent:
Daniel H Heyens, Barbara Sampson and Thomas B Combs
Umbarger #251202 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
John Umbarger #251202
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Sampson et al
as 2:2012cv12354
Plaintiff:
Fidel Hutchins
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, David Klinehart, Mariyn Moore and others
Taylor #198316 v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Donald Patrick Allen Taylor #198316
Defendant:
Chad H. Williams, Steve Lacy, Scott Fleischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGore #142739 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2012cv00049
Petitioner:
Darryl McGore #142739
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, Barbara Sampson, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGore #142739 et al v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 et al
as 1:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739, Robert Acheson #457924 and Gill Miller #388449
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Barbara Sampson, Carmen Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
