Cases 71 - 80 of 130
Thompson #241541 v. Sampson et al
as 1:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Thompson #241541
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, David Kleinhardt and Artina Tinsley Hardman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lightfoot v. Burt et al
as 2:2010cv10818
Plaintiff:
Philip Lightfoot
Defendant:
Sherry Burt, Kim Eisenbeis, RGC and others
Hulvey #257790 v. Sampson et al
as 1:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robert Hulvey #257790
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson and Patricia Caruso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Sampson et al
as 2:2009cv14832
Plaintiff:
William Evans
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Paul Condino, Stephen DeBoer and others
Howard Sanders v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 09-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairman of the Michigan Parole and Commutations Board, sue in their official and individual capacities
Osborne #157390 v. Sampson et al
as 1:2009cv01000
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Osborne #157390
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson and Paul Condino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady Smith v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 09-2331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson Michigan Parole Board
Sanders #215123 v. Sampson et al
as 2:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Howard Sanders #215123
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, Patricia L. Caruso and Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Reed v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 09-1789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY REED
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson Michigan Parole Board
Rhoades #324597 v. Palmer #496095 et al
as 2:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jason Rhoades #324597, Darrell Palmer #496095, Darrell Fader #261902 and others
Defendant:
Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Stephen DeBoer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
