Cases 31 - 40 of 138
DeJuan Edwards v. Daniel Heyens, et al
as 12-2169
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEJUAN MARNELL EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYENS, BARBARA SAMPSON and THOMAS B. COMBS
Goree #111992 v. Combs et al
as 1:2012cv00791
Plaintiff:
Denver Goree #111992, Jr.
Defendant:
Tom Combs, Amy Bonito, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Heyens et al
as 2:2012cv12743
Petitioner:
Dejuan Edwards
Respondent:
Daniel H Heyens, Barbara Sampson and Thomas B Combs
Umbarger #251202 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
John Umbarger #251202
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Sampson et al
as 2:2012cv12354
Plaintiff:
Fidel Hutchins
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, David Klinehart, Mariyn Moore and others
David Lytal, et al v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM LYTAL and PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson State of Michigan Parole Board, JAMES ATTERBERRY, Member, CHARLES L. BROWN, Member and others
Hall v. McCarthy et al
as 2:2012cv12064
Plaintiff:
Stacey Simeon Hall
Defendant:
Anne M. McCarthy , Jack F. Simms , Three Unknown Prosecutors and others
Blumenthal v. Combs et al
as 5:2012cv11859
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Blumenthal, III
Defendant:
Thomas Combs, Sonia Amos-Warchock, Amy Bonito and others
Darryl McGore v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 12-1431
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL MCGORE
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, BARBARA SAMPSON, MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden, Warden and others
Taylor #198316 v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Donald Patrick Allen Taylor #198316
Defendant:
Chad H. Williams, Steve Lacy, Scott Fleischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
