Cases
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $1,425,408.18 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY IN BARCLAY'S BANK PLC, IOM BANK ACCOUNT #4468-7377 et al
as 2:2017cv00830
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $1,425,408.18 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY IN BARCLAY'S BANK PLC, IOM BANK ACCOUNT #4468-7377, $64,809.10 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT NUMBER 488-387827, $51,631.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM NJM BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 600002524 and others
Claimant: VERONIKA BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Brownsville Emergency Physicians Group, LLC et al v. Worthington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00568
Defendant: Atlas IP Holdings, LLC, Banca Monte Paschi Siena, Barclay's Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff: Brownsville Emergency Physicians Group, LLC, Stephen Miller and Harry Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 - Deceptive Trade Practices Act
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv06020
Plaintiff: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AUTHORITY
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., BARCLAY'S BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv04352
Plaintiff: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AUTHORITY
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BARCLAY'S BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04352
Plaintiff: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BARCLAY'S BANK PLC and others
Barclay's Bank PLC v. Andrew Zahn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv03251
Plaintiff: Barclay's Bank PLC
Defendant: Andrew Zahn

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?