Cases 1 - 10 of 573
Puchtler v. Barclays PLC
as 25-995
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PUCHTLER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
BARCLAYS PLC, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, JAMES E. STALEY and others
Monasar et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2025cv01337
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Plc,, City of New York, Target Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Monasar, Jesus Hernandez Torres, Gabriel Abreu and others
Petitioner:
Sophia Daly, Devon Dawkins, M. Mostayen Faysal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Piney et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2025cv00671
Plaintiff:
Albert Piney, Roman Diaz, Jose Martinez and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Department, Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. UBS AG
as 24-1954
Defendant:
SUMITOMO MITSUI TRUST BANK LIMITED, BARCLAYS PLC, NEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
HAYMAN CAPITAL MASTER FUND, L.P., JAPAN MACRO OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P., SONTERRA CAPITAL MASTER FUND LTD. and others
Puchtler v. Barclays PLC et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
Michael Puchtler
Defendant:
Barclays PLC, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, James E. Staley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jacobs v. Barclays Bank PLC
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jacobs
Defendant:
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
