Cases 1 - 10 of 14
VOTO LATINO et al v. HIRSCH et al
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
VOTO LATINO, THE WATAUGA COUNTY VOTING RIGHTS TASK FORCE, DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, STACY EGGERS IV and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T.B. v. Doffermyre et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
T. B.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macialek, David E. Pitman, Shauna D Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
LOWERY v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00888
Defendant:
SAUNDERS, J. JESSUP, D. BARROW and others
Plaintiff:
KENYANA LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Andrews
as 5:2018hc02264
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrow v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 3:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Rasheca Barrow
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. Barrow et al
as 4:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
Defendant:
Everette Barrow, Gwendolyn Parmley, B&J Seafood, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorpe v. Barrow, et al
as 5:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Roswell Thorpe
Defendant:
Marcus Barrow, Sgt. Gwynn, Melissa D. Pelfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DIRECTV, LLC v. Barrow et al
as 4:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Macon Dean Barrow and Cubbies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Thorpe v. Barrow et al
as 5:2015ct03016
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Roswell Thorpe
Defendant:
Marcus Barrow, Sergeant Gwynn, D.A. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Barrow
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
