Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carberry v. Lancaster County Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2023cv04838
Plaintiff:
Alexis Carberry
Defendant:
Lancaster County Sheriff Office, ICO and Indv Barry Faile, Lancaster Magistrate Court ICO Curtisha M. Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnette v. Faile et al
as 0:2019cv01416
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lamont Barnette, Lamont Barnette and Mont Barnette
Defendant:
Barry Faile, William J. Nowicki, Esq. and Jason Broughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiker v. Lancaster County et al
as 5:2017cv02884
Plaintiff:
Junior Kiker
Defendant:
Lancaster County , Barry Faile , Quintin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Faile et al
as 1:2017cv00889
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Vincent
Defendant:
Barry Faile, Larry Deese and Debbie Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laney v. Watson et al
as 1:2016cv02215
Plaintiff:
Bill Laney
Defendant:
Gwen Watson , Channell Thompson , Matthew Kennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse James v. Barry Faile
as 15-6689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE M. JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF BARRY FAILE and MRS. DEBORAH HORNE
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, in Lancaster, SC
James v. Lancaster Sheriff Department et al
as 0:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jesse M James
Defendant:
Lancaster Sheriff Department, Barry Faile, Lancaster Newspaper Owner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Lancaster County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jesse M James
Defendant:
Lancaster County Detention Center, Barry Faile and Deborah Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jenkins v. Lancaster County et al
as 9:2009cv00297
Plaintiff:
Deon Demetrius Jenkins
Defendant:
Lancaster County, Lancaster County Sheriff's Office, Lancaster County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
