Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21907
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BARTLEY GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levonzel Anderson v. Shannon Warnock, et al
as 13-60435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVONZEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANNON WARNOCK, EMMIT SPARKMAN, BARTLEY GRIMES and others
Jones v. Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Transmitter et al
as 4:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Defendant:
Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Transmitter, Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Receiver, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grimes et al
as 4:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Defendant:
Bartley Grimes and Attorney General for the state of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Transmitter et al
as 4:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Eric Jones
Defendant:
Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Transmitter, Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Receiver, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Warnock et al
as 4:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Shannon Warnock, Emmit L. Sparkman, Bartley Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Grimes et al
as 4:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Defendant:
Bartley Grimes and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saez v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Angel M. Saez
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartley Grimes, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Whatley
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartley Grimes, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darile Johnson
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartley Grimes, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
