Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,122
Seehase (PS) et al v. Teske et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff: Diana Seehase and Dawn Watkins
Defendant: Andrew H. Teske, John Pryzoda, Mark J. Jachimiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Colley v. Nessel et al
as 2:2024cv10952
Petitioner: Lawrence Lee Colley
Respondent: Dana Nessel, Catherine Bauman, Hubble and others
Reese v. Bauman
as 5:2024cv10914
Petitioner: Deontez Lamar Reese
Respondent: Catherine Bauman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hawthorne et al v. Podium Corporation
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: Austin Hawthorne, Ross Mitchell, Zachary Fotis and others
Defendant: Podium Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00485
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (District or BAP)
Mason #742866 v. Bauman
as 1:2024cv00147
Petitioner: Dominic Michael Mason and Dominic Michael Mason #742866
Respondent: Warden Cathrine S. Bauman and Cathrine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 24-1108
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JACKSON
Defendant: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, Named as John/Jane Does, Health Unit Manager and others
Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 24-1111
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JACKSON
Defendant: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, Named as John/Jane Does, Health Unit Manager and others
Bauman v. Walmart, Inc
as 4:2024cv00627
Plaintiff: Lisa Bauman
Defendant: Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?