Cases 1 - 10 of 345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tony Bell v. SCF Investments Advisors, Inc., et al
as 24-7036
Plaintiff:
Tony E. Bell, doing business as Bell and Company Management and Analytics, LLC
Defendant:
SCF Investments Advisors, Inc. and SCF Securities, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JENKINS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
as 1:2023mc00125
Petitioner:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC.
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
Defendant:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
as 1:2023mc00126
Petitioner:
TOM NELTNER
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
Defendant:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
