Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Garcia et al v. Sidco Food Distribution Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv09449
Plaintiff:
Felix Garcia and Benito Sanchez
Defendant:
Sidco Food Distribution Corp. and Jose Negron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Benito Sanchez-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-1256
Petitioner:
BENITO SANCHEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Benito Sanchez Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-60892
Petitioner:
BENITO SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ, also known as Benito Sanchez, also known as Benito Sanchez Hernandez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Benito Sanchez
as 13-50074
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENITO SANCHEZ
Francisco Sanchez, et al v. Esso Standard Oil Company, et al
as 10-2317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE FRANCISCO SANCHEZ, DOLORES SERVICE STATION AND AUTO PARTS, INC., JORGE LUIS SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY, (Puerto Rico)
Defendant:
MANUELA GOMEZ and UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF THE ESTATE OF BENITO SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ, ERNESTO BALAY, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIT, QUALITY BOARD OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and others
Sanchez et al v. Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv03358
Plaintiff:
Benito Sanchez and Gloria Sanchez
Defendant:
Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company , Claims Consultants, LLC , Patricia Deverill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Benito Sanchez and Benito Sanchez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
BLANCO V US
as 02-1470
Plaintiff-Appellant:
AIXA M. PEREZ, ALEXANDER SANTIAGO, ALFREDO CORTES MARTINEZ and others
Defendant-Appellee:
KAY COLES JAMES, Director, Office of Personnel Management and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
