Cases 1 - 10 of 140
WISSINK v. WADAS
as 2:2025cv00034
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN LEE WISSINK
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Apodaca et al v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2024cv01077
Defendant:
FNU Cox/Cook, Megan Palla, Helen Casaus and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Ben Albert, Dr Victor Andrew Apodaca, Sr and Daniel Julian Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Berens
as 24-5700
Defendant:
BENJAMIN LEE BERENS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nelson v. Tewalt, et al.

as 1:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Chad Page, Director of Wadda Potatoe Farms, Benjamin Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Charee Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Ziogas v. Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk, et al
as 24-2046
Defendant:
THOMAS HARRIS, ROBERT STEIGMANN, KARL MUNDT and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ZIOGAS
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Pamlico County, North Carolina, Kent Holtberg and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al -
as 4:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Joseph Dunnebacke, Pamlico County, North Carolina, Jeremy Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Ziogas v. Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk, et al
as 24-1832
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ZIOGAS
Defendant:
FOURTH DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT CLERK, CRAIG DEARMOND, THOMAS HARRIS and others
Benjamin Ziogas v. Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk, et al
as 24-1646
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ZIOGAS
Defendant:
FOURTH DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT CLERK, CRAIG DEARMOND, THOMAS HARRIS and others
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.