Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sacramento City Employees Retirement System et al v. Weatherford International Ltd. et al
as 4:2014mc02996
Plaintiff:
Sacramento City Employees Retirement System , Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and Glenn Freedman
Movant:
Faisal Siddiqi , Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 502 & 633 Pension Trust Fund , Richard Watson and others
Defendant:
Weatherford International Ltd. , Bernard J. Duroc-Danner and Andrew P. Becnel
Respondent:
Angel Auyeung , Lisa Covington , Gia Crabtree and others
Freedman v. Weatherford International Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv02121
Plaintiff:
Glenn Freedman
Defendant:
Weatherford International Ltd., Bernard J. Duroc-Danner and Andrew P. Becnel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wandel v. Duroc-Danner et al
as 1:2012cv01305
Plaintiff:
Arnold Wandel
Defendant:
Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, Charles E. Greer, Jr., Jessica Abarca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System v. Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02537
Plaintiff:
City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Owen Kratz, Anthony Tripodo, Bart H Heijermans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dobina v. Weatherford International Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv01646
Plaintiff:
Mike Dobina
Defendant:
Weatherford International Ltd., Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, Andrew P. Becnel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Visut Kanchanapoom et al v. Weatherford International, Ltd. et al
as 2:2011cv01895
Movant:
American Federation of Musicians and Employers Pension Fund, Al Grush, Fraser Jonston and others
Defendant:
Andrew P Becnel, Nicholas F Brady, David J Butters and others
Plaintiff:
Visut Kanchanapoom and Visut Kanchanapoom
Weddle, III v. Duroc-Danner et al
as 4:2011cv00784
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Weddle, III
Defendant:
Bernard J. Duroc-Danner , Samuel W. Bodman, III , Nicholas F. Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
