Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Cunningham v. Waterloo Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv02072
Petitioner:
Samuel Bernard Jemison Cunningham
Respondent:
Waterloo Police Department, I.A.B. and Department of Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bernard Jemison Cunningham
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, IAB and Black Hawk County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison v. Givens et al
as 2:2021cv01266
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
G Givens, L Smith, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemison v. Robinson et al
as 5:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Patrick Robinson, McElroy, N Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard Jemison v. Draper CF Warden, et al
as 14-11557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD JEMISON
Defendant - Appellee:
DRAPER CF WARDEN, W. CROW, Assistant Warden and B. KING, Captain
In re: Bernard Jemison
as 14-11432
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD JEMISON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Jemison v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, W. Crow and B. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard Jemison, Jr. v. Grantt Culliver, et al
as 13-11084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD JEMISON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GRANTT CULLIVER, CARTER DAVENPORT, PATRICE RICHIE and others
Jemison v. Culliver et al
as 4:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Grant Culliver, Carter Davenport, Patrice Richie and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv00144
Petitioner:
Bernard Jemison, Jr
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
