Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cockrell v. Bessemer City Board of Education
as 2:2022cv01494
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cockrell
Defendant:
Bessemer City Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Overby v. Square et al
as 2:2021cv01416
Plaintiff:
Frederick Overby
Defendant:
Derrick Square, Dustin Alford and Bessemer, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooper et al v. Bessemer, City of et al
as 2:2018cv01869
Defendant:
Bessemer, City of, Dustin Alford and Lliana N Hayakhua
Plaintiff:
Stanley Pickens, Jr, Jessica Brook Hooper and Henry Allen Basinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bright v. Davidson Trucking Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01995
Plaintiff:
Mattie Bright
3Rd Party Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Bessemer, City of, AmTrak and others
Defendant:
Davidson Trucking Inc. and Estate of David Wayne Hatcher, The
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Shirley Hatcher and Marshall E Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Amtrak et al
as 2:2017cv01920
Plaintiff:
Shirley Hatcher and Marshall E Smith, III
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Bessemer, City of, Amtrak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collier v. Bessemer, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
Bobby Collier
Defendant:
Bessemer, City of and Bessemer Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
