Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Peters v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19887
Plaintiff:
Betty Peters
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Peters et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv02936
Plaintiff:
Stephen Peters and Betty Peters
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. James (Mallay)
as 21-2999
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard James, Betty Peter, AKA Betty Mallay, Baskinand Motillal, AKA Fat Boy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Mallay
Peters v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01425
Plaintiff:
Betty Peters
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Betty Peters, et al. v. Owens-corning Fiberglass Corpora, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-69809
Defendant:
Owens-corning Fiberglass Corpora
Plaintiff:
Betty Peters
United States of America v. Estate of Ewing R. Pirtle et al
as 3:2007cv00587
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of Ewing R. Pirtle, Estate of Ruby Pirtle, Jim Pirtle, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Alexander et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al
as 3:2007cv00799
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander, Robert Alexander, Robert Alexander and others
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
