Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PETERS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv11257
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUEMR, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY PETERS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00898
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Beverly Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Sam's East Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00920
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Beverly Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peters III et al v. Cheval Golf Club, LLC
as 8:2020cv02080
Plaintiff:
R. Beverly Peters and Howard A. Peters III
Defendant:
Cheval Golf and Athletic Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CREASAP v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv06558
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
SALLY CREASAP and THE ESTATE OF BEVERLY PETERS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Sam's East Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
Beverly Peters
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephens et al v. Elkhart County Superior Court No 6 et al
as 3:2007cv00341
Plaintiff:
Michael Jack Stephens and Christopher Joe Stephens
Defendant:
Elkhart County Superior Court No 6, Stephanie Burgess, Elkhart County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENS et al v. ELKHART COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 6 et al
as 1:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACK STEPHENS and CHRISTOPHER JOE STEPHENS
Defendant:
ELKHART COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 6, CLERK OF COURTS STEPHANIE BURGESS, ELKHART COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
