Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Clarke v. Prummell, Jr. et al
as 2:2025cv00376
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Clarke
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, Jr., Brad Stender, Mitchell Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burrows v. Prummell
as 2:2025cv00011
Defendant:
Bill Prummell
Plaintiff:
Albert Burrows
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sheets v. Prummell et al

as 2:2024cv00943
Defendant:
Deputy Christopher Scott Williams and Sheriff Bill Prummell
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bryant Sheets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ausloos v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Prummell and Deputy Jonathan Schwartz
Plaintiff:
Adam Ausloos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Whitney J. Charles
Defendant:
Amira D. Fox, Bill Prummell, Patrick Mulvaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuthbert v. Prummell, et al
as 2:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edward Cuthbert
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Prummell and Dorothy Coates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
J. Thompson, M. Ledoux, J. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Prummell, et al
as 2:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, Tamantha Poulton, Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al

as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Prummell et al
as 2:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, CPI Buckinsky, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.