Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gorman v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00005
Petitioner:
James S. Gorman
Respondent:
District Attorneys for Tarrant County, Sheriff Bill E. Waybourn and Phil Sorrels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Bill E. Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Mr. Iceom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00913
Petitioner:
Maurice Henry Mason
Respondent:
Bill E. Waybourn and Tarrant County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Bill E. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Brandi R. Mosley
Defendant:
Tarrant Co. Jail, Tarrant Co. Parole, Sheriff Bill E. Waybourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shamlin v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Bobby R. Shamlin
Defendant:
Bill E. Waybourn, Tarrant County Jail and Gray Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Tarrant County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
Shanelle Jenkins
Defendant:
Tarrant County Sheriff's Office, Bill E. Waybourn and Tarrant County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Panuthos
as 4:2021cv00119
Respondent:
Bill E Waybourn and Magistrate Brooke Panuthos
Petitioner:
Kedarius Kentrell Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tamunoene v. Tarrant County Sheriff
as 4:2020cv01293
Respondent:
Tarrant County Sheriff and Sheriff Bill E. Waybourn
Petitioner:
Anthony Tamunoene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. Waybourn
as 4:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
James Allen Norris, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill E Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
