Cases 1 - 10 of 1,966
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sleep Doctor, LLC v. Sleep Doctor Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Sleep Doctor, LLC
Defendant:
Sleep Doctor Holdings, LLC, The Sleep Doctor, LLC, Bill Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Pruitt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Bill Pruitt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Empowered Community Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Bill Cobb
Defendant:
Empowered Community Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cary v. Bill et al
as 2:2024cv10730
Defendant:
Bill, Dollar Bill, Jackson County Youth Center and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary
Billings v. Failing
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Candace Victoria Billings
Defendant:
Robert Louis Failing
HEASTON et al v. E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ESTHER HEASTON and BILL HEASTON
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Russell Brooks
Defendant:
Bill Lee and David Roush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
