Cases 21 - 30 of 98
McGhee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2011cv03426
Plaintiff:
Leon McGhee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Billy Mitchem and David Tulley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2011cv02907
Petitioner:
Andre Lynell Wallace
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 7:2011cv02666
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Patric and Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keenum v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv02460
Petitioner:
Douglas Louis Keenum
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roby v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2011cv02197
Petitioner:
Warren Lee Roby
Respondent:
Billy . Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of ALabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Puckett v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv02190
Plaintiff:
Roy Al Puckett
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Donald Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2011cv02184
Plaintiff:
Lester Carpenter Reed
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Ruth Naglich, Billy Mitchem and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv01528
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Watkins
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Lloyd Wallace, Derwin Halbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillentine v. Mitchem
as 6:2011cv01316
Petitioner:
Tommy James Gillentine
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv01129
Petitioner:
James Earl Morris
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
