Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Chafin v. SWVRJA-Duff et al
as 7:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Billy Robert Chafin
Defendant:
SWVRJA-Duff, Crystal Large, Virginia Dept Of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13398
Plaintiff:
BILLY ROBERTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONKEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07797
Plaintiff:
BILLY ROBERT KONKEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONKEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46027
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BILLY ROBERT KONKEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2018cv01341
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bouchard, Alice Donovan, Frank Pimental and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
John Westine, Jr. v. Billy Robert
as 16-6500
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN G. WESTINE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
BILLY ROBERTS, Jailer of the Franklin County Jail
John Westine, Jr. v. Billy Robert
as 16-6284
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN G. WESTINE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
BILLY ROBERTS, Jailer
ROBERTS et al v. WALGREEN CO.
as 1:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
BILLIE ROBERTS and FRED ROBERTS
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cook, et al. v. City of Fairfield, et al.
as 2:2015cv02339
Plaintiff:
Billy Robert Cook , Michael John Maroulas and Becky Smisek-Gage
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Walt Tibbet, Rebecca Belk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westine v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
John G. Westine, Jr.
Respondent:
Billy Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
