Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Grumpy Cat Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2020cv07152
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, BULING, COOL-US and others
Plaintiff:
Grumpy Cat Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Yu v. America's Wholesale Lender
as 5:2016cv01545
Plaintiff:
Jane Bin Yu
Defendant:
America's Wholesale Lender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Yu v. Clear Recon Corp and New Ligh Realty Inc.
as 5:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jan Bin Yu
Defendant:
Clear Recon Corp and New Light Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yu v. Clear Recon Corp
as 5:2015cv04458
Plaintiff:
Jane Bin Yu
Defendant:
Clear Recon Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jeremias et al v. Idreamsky Technology Limited et al
as 1:2015cv03484
Plaintiff:
Abraham Jeremias , Roger Mariani and Michael Rubin
Defendant:
Idreamsky Technology Limited , Michael Xiangyu Chen, Jeffrey Lyndon Ko and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Yu v. Carroll
as 3:2014cv04101
Defendant:
Michael Carroll
Plaintiff:
Bin Yu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yu v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv05256
Plaintiff:
Bin Yu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff and Robert S. Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
