Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Blade v. Springfield News-Leader Newspaper et al
as 6:2018cv03420
Defendant:
Springfield News-Leader Newspaper, Allen Jones and Stephen Herzog
Plaintiff:
Courtney Blade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blade v. Springfield News-Leader Newspaper et al
as 6:2018cv03384
Defendant:
Springfield News-Leader Newspaper, Allen Jones and Stephen Herzog
Plaintiff:
Courtney Blade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blade v. Advanced Correctional Health Care
as 6:2018cv03212
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Health Care
Plaintiff:
Courtney Blade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01848
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Austin , Carol Ashworth , Tracie Austin and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blades v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv03083
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Blades
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Blades v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv03178
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Blades
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ragsdale v. City of Moberly et al
as 4:2013cv02107
Plaintiff:
Sherry Ragsdale
Defendant:
Jeremy Baird, Chandra Blades and City of Moberly, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ragsdale v. City of Moberly et al
as 2:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Sherry Ragsdale
Defendant:
Jeremy Baird, Chandra Blades and City of Moberly, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Blades et al
as 4:2013cv00747
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Respondent:
Randy Blades, Clerk of the Court, Gregory Stremel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Blades et al
as 4:2013cv01412
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Respondent:
Randy Blades, Clerk of the Court, Gregory Stremel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
